AOM Junior Does: Senior Yearling
Lavinia Allen
Rank: 1st
Entry A Generation: 1
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry A places over Entry F for her advantage in General Appearance. Entry A is wider and longer throughout, more extension to the brisket and more level through her topline.
Rank: 2nd
Entry F Generation: 3
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry F over Entry B in General Appearance for also being longer and wider throughout, she has a closer toe set and in Body Capacity is deep in the heart girth and barrel.
Rank: 3rd
Entry B Generation: 1
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry B over Entry D in General Appearance. Entry B is straighter in the forelegs, has more width between the hocks and in the rump and is longer in bone.
Rank: 4th
Entry D Generation: 3
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry D over Entry C in General Appearance. Entry D is more level through her topline, higher in the withers and she has a longer leaner neck.
Rank: 5th
Entry C Generation: 3
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry C over Entry E in General Appearance. Entry C is wider between the hocks and in the chest floor, longer in bone, and has smoother blending from loin to rump.
Rank: 6th
Entry E Generation: 3
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry E although standing last in this class is to be commended for her General Appearance being high in the escutcheon area, and in Body Capacity for being deep in the barrel.
Ed Kinser
Rank: 1st
Entry A Generation: 1
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Our first two does in line are close in placement, but A will be in first place with her greater length of body, more level topline, and smoothness of blending with more correct structure in the front end assembly. A is wider between the hocks but would be improved with straighter rear legs when viewed from behind.
Rank: 2nd
Entry F Generation: 3
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry F stands in second place over Entry B for her greater width and depth in the barrel. F also has a more level rump and greater width between the hocks.
Rank: 3rd
Entry B Generation: 1
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry B stands ahead of Entry D for her strength in general appearance. B has the more correct and better blending front end structure with her front legs fall directly beneath the withers. B also excels D by having more correct feet. Her rear legs are straighter when viewed from the rear and her front legs are straighter with the feet facing forward.
Rank: 4th
Entry D Generation: 3
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry D stands ahead of Entry C for her more level topline. She is higher in the withers, straighter in the chine and loin, and has a more correct angle to the rump.
Rank: 5th
Entry C Generation: 3
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry C stands ahead of Entry E for her smoother blending. She has more correctly angulated rear legs and more width between the hocks.
Rank: 6th
Entry E Generation: 3
To view more images of this entry: hover over the image and scroll left/right
Side View
Rear View
Top View
Front View
Entry E is to be commended for her sharpness of withers and good spring of rib.